Saturday, March 29, 2014


Animal testing for biomedical research is a highly controversial topic. People feel very strongly about its advantages and disadvantages because it involves the search for cures for many diseases that affect humans and animals as well.

In 1796, English physician Edward Jenner injected the pus from cowpox blisters to an eight-year-old boy inoculating him against the small’s pox and creating the first vaccine. With the help of other animals like sheep’s, dogs and rodents, others physicians developed other vaccines for diseases such as, rabies and typhoid.

Moving forward to the 21st century, animal research continues in the study and search of medical treatments for 200 types of cancer, drug addiction and muscular degeneration etc.

I will be narrowing my topic to the pros and cons of animal testing for medical research and the promises of alternative solutions to medical advances without the use of animals for research.

Works cited

Newton, David E. The Animal Experimentation Debate Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2013.

1 comment:

  1. i find it interesting that Edward Jenner tested his theory to an 8 year old kid first, but then again advancement in a field does not start with not taking risks, i remember giving the smallpox immunizations to patients, its a long process requiring multiple stabs and a lot of maintenance and follow ups to keep up with the CDC guidelines and requirements.looking forward to reading the pros and cons of your subject

    ReplyDelete